Re: psql & readline & win32

From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql & readline & win32
Date: 2006-02-13 18:06:58
Message-ID: 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0F785@algol.sollentuna.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> >> What would we patch it with? I don't think anybody has found a
> >> problem there, this is a separate file that you ship along with it.
>
> > Well, the problem is that it handles backslash incorrectly.
> We could
> > patch that in the readline source rather than playing with a
> > configuaration file.
>
> Do the readline developers agree that it's "incorrect"? I
> could see shipping a patch as a short-term band-aid, but not
> if the patch isn't going to be accepted upstream.

I have seen no such agreement. The ability to reconfigure the keys is
definitly a feature, so it could perhaps be argued to be that. In
general, I don't think they care too much about win32 :-( Which is
another thing that makes libedit a lot more encouraging - if it could be
made working.

Bruce wrote:
> I think what we don't have is saving history between psql uses.

We do keep history if the new psql is startede in the same
commandprompt. If you start a new cmd, history gets reset. (Which is
what happens if you start it from the start menu)

//Magnus

//Magnus

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-13 18:09:57 Re: psql & readline & win32
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-02-13 18:00:14 Re: psql & readline & win32