| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Euler Taveira de Oliveira" <eulerto(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br>, "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
| Date: | 2005-12-01 18:26:54 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E8D2@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
> > That would be fairly trivial ... let me add it to the 'todo
> list' ...
> > I take it that it would be safe to relegate the
> /pub/source/OLD stuff
> > there too?
>
> Not so trivial to put behind a web interface or the download
> tracker though. Is it really necessary to have a separate
> archive downloads site? It's not like the old ones get in the
> way, or cost anything other than disk space on the mirrors to
> store (and I've only ever heard mirror admins say how small
> our site is compared to many others!).
>
> Plus of course, weren't we trying to reduce the number of VMs/sites?
Agreed. If we're going to keep it, just sticking it in a /old/ directory
is definitly a lot better.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2005-12-01 18:45:48 | Re: generalizing the planner knobs |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2005-12-01 18:24:20 | Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-12-01 19:09:07 | Re: [PATCHES] aclchk.c refactor |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-01 17:21:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |