| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Gavin Sherry" <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Case study: Proximity |
| Date: | 2005-11-29 21:29:52 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E8C5@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> > > "We consider the availability of source code a major advantage of
> > > using an open source database. We haven't had to go a fix
> any bugs
> > > ourselves, but we have peered at the source to satisfy
> ourselves as
> > > to how things work" -- Tim Allen, Senior Software
> Developer, Proximity Group.
> > >
> >
> > There are other good quotes:
> >
> > "Our systems are deployed in high-availability environments and the
> > combination of PostgreSQL on Linux has enabled us to deploy and
> > support systems without any need for a large support team."
> >
>
> Yeah, how do we feel about multiple quotes from the same person?
I see no problem in general with it. Assuming we have "enough" quotes in
general that is - so we get a reasonable rotation in respect to person
as well as quote.
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-11-30 01:29:24 | Re: svr2/unionfs |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-11-29 21:27:03 | Re: Case study: Proximity |