| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Search machine is ready |
| Date: | 2006-02-15 20:13:06 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C802C@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> > - Vendor changes. I don't like to run packages I know to
> have been changed by the vendor - for example, it was noted
> the other day that the Debian PostgreSQL packages contains
> patches that aren't in PGDG releases. In this case the only
> OS vendor I would trust with a modified PostgreSQL is Red
> Hat, for fairly obvious reasons.
> >
> The search machine currently has MammothPostgreSQL FOSS on
> it. Which is pure PostgreSQL.
Well, we *certainly* can't trust those darn MammothPG guys to get things
right :-)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-02-15 22:12:03 | Re: Search machine is ready |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-02-15 17:05:25 | Re: Search machine is ready |