From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql & readline & win32 |
Date: | 2006-01-02 08:52:58 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7DFF@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > I don't think it is good practice to ship packaged software that is
> > statically linked to a gpl library and then claim that
> your package
> > is bsd licensed. If I were trying to use the windows
> installer in a
> > commercial application, I sure wouldn't want that liability.
>
> Why should we statically link it?
>
> How well maintained is libedit? I'd feel happier about a
> switch if I could find a maintained home page for it.
There appears to be more than one (!)
There's one on http://sourceforge.net/projects/libedit/, and one on
http://www.thrysoee.dk/editline/ at least. And
http://www.s11n.net/editline/. And
http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/editline.html.
The second one supports cygwin, but not mingw. The first one I have no
idea, but it has made no release since 2001 so it doesn't seem very
active, whereas the second one made a release in oct 2005. I think the
second one is the one the guy in the blog post I sent before was
referring to, but I'm not sure.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-01-02 09:00:51 | Re: psql & readline & win32 |
Previous Message | pmagnoli | 2006-01-02 08:51:23 | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |