| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ... |
| Date: | 2005-09-19 15:12:14 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C79B7@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Is there a reason the old/new can't be aliaseed to each
> other, instead
> > of the old just being removed?
>
> Any change like that would require another initdb. If we
> were going to force another initdb, my vote would be to
> revert these functions to where they were in beta1. It was a
> mistake to change them in such a hurry.
If we want to do that, we should probably try to roll a beta3 with that
as soon as possible, so not too many people have upgraded to beta2...
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-09-19 15:24:33 | Re: Does anybody use ORDER BY x USING y? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-19 15:09:12 | Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY |