From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-12 09:17:00 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C7492@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Not kill -9. Kill -9 is "safe" because it causes a complete
> restart of
> > the postmaster (it's the same as a backend crash, really).
> Kill -INT
> > is also safe, because it does a simlpe query cancel.
>
> I don't recall exactly; AFAIR this was discussed between Dave
> and Tom.
> Actually, *both* should be accessible (maybe with some
> restriction making it difficult to call it from an sql cmd line)
Actually, I take the blame for starging that discussion - it started
when I craeted the pg_cancel_backend / pg_kill_backend questions.
Now, I *want* these functions. But I want them to be safe :-) (I want
kill -TERM on the commandline to be safe as well!)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Hansen | 2005-05-12 09:30:13 | Re: SQL_ASCII vs. 7-bit ASCII encodings |
Previous Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2005-05-12 09:16:00 | Re: Server instrumentation for 8.1 |