From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Copeland" <tom(at)infoether(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "PostgreSQL www" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Problem with web TODO list |
Date: | 2005-04-18 17:03:28 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE6C72F5@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
>> Agreed, bugzilla isn't going to help. Frankly, I haven't
>see the software
>> that *would* help. I don't think it's been written yet.
>What we need is
>> software that:
>>
>> 1) let us track various TODOs
>> 2) kept draft specifications for those TODOs
>> 3) kept partial code when contributed
>> 4) linked to e-mail discussions
>> 5) tracked who'd volunteered to implement and/or test features
>> 6) tracked which features were dependant on which other
>features being
>> implemented.
>> 7) was searchable
>
>Sounds a bit like the RFE tracker on a PGFoundry project...
Really? In my experience, those trackers certainly make me understand
Bruce's not wanting to use them ;)
AFAIK, they're missing a lot of the requirements Josh put forward, and
IMHO (but that's MHO only, of course) are not very flexible to work with
;-) (for example, the fact that it remails the entire item on any change
at all annoys me very much :P)
It may be closer than Bugzilla, but I think it's pretty far off still...
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Copeland | 2005-04-18 17:21:24 | Re: Problem with web TODO list |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-18 14:51:23 | Re: Problem with web TODO list |