From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: win32 performance - fsync question |
Date: | 2005-02-20 18:31:11 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE47690F@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Portability, or rather the complete lack of it. Stuff that
>isn't in the
>> Single Unix Spec is a hard sell.
>
>O_DIRECT is reasonably common among modern Unixen (it is supported by
>Linux, FreeBSD, and probably a couple of the commercial variants like
>AIX or IRIX); it should also be reasonably easy to check for
>support at
>configure time. It's on my TODO list to take a gander at
>adding support
>for O_DIRECT for WAL, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.
Let me know when you do, and if you need some pointers on the win32
parts of it :-) I'll happily leave the main changes alone.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-20 19:01:20 | Re: SMP buffer management test question |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2005-02-20 17:42:01 | Re: Fwd: Apple Darwin disabled fsync? |