From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Shachar Shemesh" <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | <pginstaller-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |
Date: | 2004-09-29 10:17:26 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE475D9B@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> > * 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this
> > * software must display the following acknowledgment:
> > * "This product includes software developed by the
> OpenSSL Project
> > * for use in the OpenSSL Toolkit. (http://www.openssl.org/)"
> >
> >
> I read it to mean that you should mention that only if you
> tout the SSL option of pgAdmin. I hate the advertising clause.
>
> Can we contact them and see if they were part of the group
> that agreed to switch to the three points BSD license without
> the advertising clause?
OpenSSL isn't BSD license, and AFAIK never was. It has an apache style
license. Don'tt hink that would apply.
I guess if we're unsure we could always mail them and ask, though!
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-09-29 10:30:16 | Re: [Pginstaller-devel] OpenSSL Licence |
Previous Message | cvs | 2004-09-29 10:16:42 | CVS Commit by dpage: Add OpenSSL licence. |