From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Function to kill backend |
Date: | 2004-04-05 09:05:53 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE17163B@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > In this case, SIGINT (query cancel) will not help, because
> all locks
> > held by the transaction will still be held.
>
> Wrong.
Really?
Please point out where I am wrong in this:
SESSION A: BEGIN TRANSACTION
SESSION A: LOCK TABLE foo IN ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE
SESSION B: SELECT * FROM foo <-- blocks (expected)!
not-in-session: KILL -INT <pid_of_session_A>
(at this point, <pid_of_session_A> is listed as "idle in transaction")
SESSION B: <-- still blcoks....
SESSION A: ROLLBACK
SESSION B: <-- now completes
If I kill it with TERM instead of INT, SESSION B is released at that
point.
Am I missing something very obvious here?
This is on:
PostgreSQL 7.4.2 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.95.3
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-04-05 09:37:35 | Re: i18n of PostgreSQL - part 1 |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-04-05 06:40:40 | Regression from 7.3 to 7.4 |