From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |
Date: | 2005-07-24 12:05:44 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE094605@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
> So, two questions:
>
> 1) Do we want to put up a Coverity Inspected button? On
> the plus side,
> Oracle, MySQL and BerkeleyDB (as well as FreeBSD) have all
> gone through the Coverity checker, so it says good things
> about our competitiveness to
> other database products. On the negative side, do we really care?
I'd say that if "business customers" care, then we should care.
> 2) If we want to put up the button, *where*? We don't
> really have a page
> on the web site for "certifications and awards", but maybe we
> ought to?
Um. We have an "Awards" page in case you missed it ;-) It's at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/awards.
Are you saying we should rename it to "Certifications and awards", or
create a separate page for certifications?
Do we have more than one certification (possibly pending)? If not, a
separate page with just on certification might look a bit weird :-)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-07-24 14:55:11 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-07-24 01:50:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2005-07-24 14:55:11 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-07-24 01:50:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Coverity Inspected, 20 bugs detected! |