| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4 |
| Date: | 2005-06-23 17:34:30 |
| Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE09455E@algol.sollentuna.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> Has Kerb4 been marked as depricated in the docs at all? If
> not it might be best to just do that and then yank it later.
Yes, since 7.4.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/auth-methods.html#KERBEROS-AUT
H
"Kerberos 4 is considered insecure and no longer recommended for general
use."
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2005-06-23 17:35:13 | Re: TX semantics backward compatibility |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-23 17:30:56 | Re: plpgsql constraint checked data fails to restore |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthew T. O'Connor | 2005-06-23 17:40:18 | Re: PL/pgSQL Debugger Support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-23 17:30:56 | Re: plpgsql constraint checked data fails to restore |