From: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: default database creation with initdb |
Date: | 2005-06-18 08:49:14 |
Message-ID: | 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE094541@algol.sollentuna.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Umm. Tiny item, but your comment still refers to the database as
pg_system ;-)
//Magnus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-patches-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Andreas Pflug
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 10:42 AM
> To: PostgreSQL-patches
> Subject: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb
>
> As per discussion on -hackers the attached patch creates the
> 'default'
> database at initdb time as a default target for initial
> connections to keep template1 free from connections and
> available as template source.
>
> I consider this DB a system object, so it's created before
> make_template0 sets the last_system_oid (wondering why
> template0 isn't considered a system db too)
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-18 08:53:55 | Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend) |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2005-06-18 08:30:37 | Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-18 08:55:21 | Re: default database creation with initdb |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-06-18 08:42:02 | default database creation with initdb |