| From: | Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Config settings for large restore |
| Date: | 2007-11-28 15:46:06 |
| Message-ID: | 6B261DD8-806B-4C43-BCCC-04D506482D31@khera.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Nov 27, 2007, at 3:30 PM, Erik Jones wrote:
> I'm just wondering what is considered the general wisdom on config
> setting for large pg_restore runs. I know to increase
> maintenance_work_mem and turn off autovacuum and stats collection.
> Shoule should checkpoint_segments and checkpoint_timeout be
> increased? Would twiddling shared_buffers help? What about
At least with 8.0 testing I did a while back, I found that bumping
checkpoint segments was the biggest benefit. I use 256 segments as a
matter of course now, even for normal operations.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. MailerMailer, LLC Rockville, MD
http://www.MailerMailer.com/ +1-301-869-4449 x806
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-11-28 15:47:44 | Re: PostgreSQL DB split |
| Previous Message | Chad Hendren | 2007-11-28 15:32:36 | PostgresSQL vs. Informix |