From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Subject: | Re: search_path vs extensions |
Date: | 2009-05-29 16:22:03 |
Message-ID: | 6A47AF24-4C11-4D7B-A44C-0D414AC5FAAF@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On May 29, 2009, at 3:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Yeah, to reiterate what I posted elsewhere, perhaps it'd be a good
> idea to
> give up on the search path idea altogether and think more in terms
> of an
> import facility like Python, Java, and sometimes Perl have.
+1
Actually, Perl's is usually a file path. `use Foo::Bar::Baz;` triggers
a search for Foo/Bar/Baz.pm unless Foo::Bar::Baz is already loaded.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-05-29 16:23:26 | Re: search_path vs extensions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-29 16:17:44 | Re: Compiler warning cleanup - unitilized const variables, pointer type mismatch |