| From: | "Lim Berger" <straightfwd007(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Sander Steffann" <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Postgresql General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "Out of memory" errors.. |
| Date: | 2007-08-13 18:16:40 |
| Message-ID: | 69d2538f0708131116y6b9740cem58ce9a3399346aa3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 8/14/07, Sander Steffann <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl> wrote:
> Hi Lim,
>
> > "Lim Berger" <straightfwd007(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> Wow, you are right! The "su - postgres" showed up with wildly
> >> different values! Most notably, the "max user processes" is only 20!!
> >> Whereas in the regular user stuff it was above 14000. Would you know
> >> how to change this in a CentOS Linux machine? Where can I find the
> >> startup settings for postgresql?
> >
> > Yipes, that's pretty bogus. The most likely culprit would be a .profile
> > or .bashrc script belonging to the postgres user --- poke around in its
> > home directory.
>
> It might also be in /etc/security/limits.conf.
Thanks. I see these two lines in that file:
postgres soft nofile 8192
postgres hard nofile 8192
How should I change these values? I am not sure how this reflects the
"ulimit" options.
Thanks!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ben | 2007-08-13 18:20:20 | Re: is there a psql equivilent of fsck? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-13 18:16:22 | Re: is there a psql equivilent of fsck? |