| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support |
| Date: | 2018-01-17 22:01:16 |
| Message-ID: | 69b20f5b-ef6b-b563-20c2-08ecb9473d76@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/17/18 13:18, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The proposed GnuTLS patch does make use of ssl_dh_params_file.
>
> Right, but what happens if say macTLS doesn't?
The previously proposed patch for that also makes use of ssl_dh_params_file.
So while we can't guarantee that this will be the case for all TLS
implementations ever, this is a pretty good indicator to me that it is
an implementation-independent concept.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2018-01-17 22:09:58 | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Edmund Horner | 2018-01-17 21:47:11 | Re: PATCH: psql tab completion for SELECT |