From: | "Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: transactoin id wraparound problem |
Date: | 2006-09-06 17:39:16 |
Message-ID: | 6992E470F12A444BB787B5C937B9D4DF05ABC83C@ca-mail1.cis.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
I started this about a few hours ago (I guess the message shows as a
general warning)..I am only interested in the specific database..will
this command NOT do a full vacuum of the specific database(I would like
to save the few hours that I invested in this vacuum command if
possible)
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:35 AM
To: Sriram Dandapani
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transactoin id wraparound problem
Change the -f to -a
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:02, Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> I created a super user using the createuser command and issued
>
> vacuumdb -f -U superuser <database-name>
>
> I still keep getting a decreasing transaction count warning. Am I
doing
> something wrong here.(The database is about 120G and while I do expect
> vacuum full to take time, I expect the warning to show an increasing
> count)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-09-06 17:57:27 | Re: transactoin id wraparound problem |
Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-09-06 17:34:40 | Re: transactoin id wraparound problem |