Re: transactoin id wraparound problem

From: "Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: transactoin id wraparound problem
Date: 2006-09-06 17:39:16
Message-ID: 6992E470F12A444BB787B5C937B9D4DF05ABC83C@ca-mail1.cis.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

I started this about a few hours ago (I guess the message shows as a
general warning)..I am only interested in the specific database..will
this command NOT do a full vacuum of the specific database(I would like
to save the few hours that I invested in this vacuum command if
possible)

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 10:35 AM
To: Sriram Dandapani
Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] transactoin id wraparound problem

Change the -f to -a

On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 11:02, Sriram Dandapani wrote:
> I created a super user using the createuser command and issued
>
> vacuumdb -f -U superuser <database-name>
>
> I still keep getting a decreasing transaction count warning. Am I
doing
> something wrong here.(The database is about 120G and while I do expect
> vacuum full to take time, I expect the warning to show an increasing
> count)

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2006-09-06 17:57:27 Re: transactoin id wraparound problem
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2006-09-06 17:34:40 Re: transactoin id wraparound problem