From: | "Sriram Dandapani" <sdandapani(at)counterpane(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Pgsql-Performance \(E-mail\)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: planner not using index for like operator |
Date: | 2006-04-25 18:31:12 |
Message-ID: | 6992E470F12A444BB787B5C937B9D4DF0406B26C@ca-mail1.cis.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
The col is a varchar. I am currently testing with the inet data type(and
also the ipv4 pgfoundry data type).
Due to time constraints, I am trying to minimize code changes.
What kind of index do I need to create to enable efficient range scans
(e.g anything between 172.16.x.x thru 172.31.x.x) on the inet data type?
Thanks
Sriram
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim C. Nasby [mailto:jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:25 AM
To: Sriram Dandapani
Cc: Pgsql-Performance (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] planner not using index for like operator
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:08:02AM -0700, Sriram Dandapani wrote:
Here's the key:
> " Filter: ((col1)::text ~~ '172.%'::text)"
In order to do a like comparison, it has to convert col1 (which I'm
guessing is of type 'inet') to text, so there's no way it can use an
index on col1 (maybe a function index, but that's a different story).
Is there some reason you're not doing
WHERE col1 <<= '172/8'::inet
?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2006-04-25 18:33:38 | Re: Large (8M) cache vs. dual-core CPUs |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-04-25 18:24:45 | Re: planner not using index for like operator |