Re: Re[2]: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Alexey V(dot) Borzov" <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re[2]: WTF is going on with PG_VERSION?
Date: 2000-09-19 16:24:01
Message-ID: 6982.969380641@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Alexey V. Borzov" <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru> writes:
> Greetings.
> Monday, September 18, 2000, 10:38:37 PM, you wrote:
>>> 18 15:53:06 arbat logger: FATAL 1: File '/var/lib/pgsql/PG_VERSION' does not exist or no read permission.
>>>
>>> Well, '/var/lib/pgsql/PG_VERSION' does exist, it has read permission
>>> for user 'postgres' (I made it world readable, in fact, after I
>>> discovered this).

There is also supposed to be a PG_VERSION file in each database
subdirectory. For example, on my setup:

$ find /opt/postgres -name 'PG_VERSION'
/opt/postgres/data/base/template1/PG_VERSION
/opt/postgres/data/base/tree/PG_VERSION
/opt/postgres/data/base/play/PG_VERSION
/opt/postgres/data/PG_VERSION

If you accidentally deleted one of these per-database PG_VERSION files
then future connects to that database would fail with the above
message. To recover (assuming that was your only mistake), copy the
top-level PG_VERSION into the subdirectory.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-09-19 16:36:22 Re: nasty problem with redhat 6.2 + pg 7.02
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2000-09-19 16:22:14 Re: Is it possible to search for sub-strings...