| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zane <Zane(at)mail4z(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: vm/swap used until exhausted |
| Date: | 2004-08-24 19:51:18 |
| Message-ID: | 6974.1093377078@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Zane <Zane(at)mail4z(dot)com> writes:
> client does:
> begin
> bulk inserts into single table via PQexecParams (1.2 million records)
> commit
Could we see a concrete test case? I really don't have time to guess
about what contributing factors might be involved ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-24 19:59:12 | Re: replacing a function called "isnull" reports an error |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-24 19:49:56 | Re: server crash in very big transaction [postgresql 8.0beta1] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-08-24 20:06:37 | Re: server crash in very big transaction [postgresql 8.0beta1] |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-24 19:49:56 | Re: server crash in very big transaction [postgresql 8.0beta1] |