Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Date: 2008-11-26 13:40:25
Message-ID: 6951.1227706825@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 20:33 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So we really don't have any methodically-gathered evidence about the
>> effects of different stats settings. It wouldn't take a lot to convince
>> us to switch to a different default, I think, but it would be nice to
>> have more than none.

> I don't this is not empirical but really, 150 is very reasonable. Let's
> just set it to that by default and be done with it.

What happened to the "more than zero evidence" part of the discussion?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-11-26 13:47:29 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-11-26 13:32:32 Re: Visibility map, partial vacuums