From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GiST concurrency commited |
Date: | 2005-06-27 14:38:07 |
Message-ID: | 6946.1119883087@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> writes:
> While I'm running test with concurrent
> select/insert/update/delete/vacuum/vacuum full I found, that sometimes
> postgres crashes in index_beginscan_internal on FunctionCall3, because
> structure 'procedure' becomes zeroed. As I understand, LockRelation
> can invalidate part of Relation structure. So, I moved
> GET_REL_PROCEDURE after LockRelation.
Oooh, good catch.
> It seems to me, this patch
> should be backpatched or it's needed another fixing.
No, it's not an issue in the back branches, because until recently
GET_REL_PROCEDURE only fetched the function OID.
> And there is one more problem: it caused approximatly one time per 2-4 million
> statements, I got traps:
> TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((*curpage)->offsets_used == num_tuples)", File:
> "vacuum.c", Line: 2766)
> LOG: server process (PID 15847) was terminated by signal 6
Odd. Will look at it later (after feature freeze), if you don't find
the cause beforehand.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-27 14:44:41 | Re: Questions on extending a relation |
Previous Message | strk | 2005-06-27 14:37:11 | Re: accessing postgres conf from stored procedure |