From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys |
Date: | 2001-04-03 19:34:51 |
Message-ID: | 6943.986326491@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> At 14:33 3/04/01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I notice that pg_dump now dumps primary-key indexes in the style
>>
>> CREATE TABLE ... (
>> "dest_index" integer DEFAULT ...,
>> Constraint "dest_addresses_pkey" Primary Key ("dest_index")
>> );
> My 7.0 dumps PK in table definitions as well, AFAICT (but it may have been
> patched) - can you check yours?
Ah, you are right. My mistake --- the lossage is of longer standing
than I thought.
> We really need ALTER TABLE ADD CONSTRAINT for PK.
That would be a cleaner way to do it, all right ... but for now, you can
just reach in and set the indisprimary flag in pg_index after creating
the index. I'm visualizing
CREATE TABLE table
( field int NOT NULL, ...);
load data
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX table_pkey ON table(field);
UPDATE pg_index SET indisprimary = true WHERE indexrelid =
(SELECT oid FROM pg_class WHERE relname = 'table_pkey');
On the other hand, that would fall over if executed by a non-superuser.
Drat. Okay, I guess we just have to leave this as a TODO item for now.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2001-04-03 20:01:00 | Re: pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-04-03 19:18:32 | Re: pg_dump performance lossage for primary keys |