| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
| Date: | 2023-06-06 19:18:02 |
| Message-ID: | 692bed6e-d86f-094b-11ab-9d4ccc2c802a@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/6/23 15:15, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 14:11 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
>> This discussion makes me wonder (though probably too late for the v16
>> cycle) if we shouldn't treat "C" and "POSIX" locales to be a third
>> provider, something like "internal".
>
> That's exactly what I did in v6 of this series: I created a "none"
> provider, and when someone specified provider=icu iculocale=C, it would
> change the provider to "none":
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5f9bf4a0b040428c5db2dc1f23cc3ad96acb5672.camel%40j-davis.com
>
> I'm fine with either approach.
Ha!
Well it seems like I am +1 on that then ;-)
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-06-06 19:18:20 | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-06-06 19:15:39 | Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction |