From: | Simon Windsor <simon(dot)windsor(at)cornfield(dot)me(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slow timestamp query after upgrading from Pg13 to Pg16 |
Date: | 2025-04-07 19:25:28 |
Message-ID: | 692a315e-6dd8-4194-8c7f-c45425852e77@cornfield.me.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi
We used pg_dump|pg_restore to migrate the data.
The full explain plan is at https://explain.depesz.com/s/742M. The SQL
explain (analyze, buffers) select count(*) from consignments where
(req_status_tstamp >= '2025-03-28 00:00'::timestamp and
req_status_tstamp <= '2025-03-28 01:00'::timestamp);
takes 2-3s with the old Pg13 DB, and over a minute with Pg16
After spending many hours looking at DB settings and Statistic settings
I am at a loss/
Simon
On 07/04/2025 15:51, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Mon, 2025-04-07 at 15:48 +0100, Simon Windsor wrote:
>> After upgrading a Db from Pg13 (Centos) to Pg16(Ubuntu) some queries
>> on a simple, large table (200M rows) are very slow
> If you used "pg_upgrade", did you ANALYZE the database?
>
> If that is not the problem, we can't guess what your problem might be
> unless you provide EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, SETTINGS) output for auch a
> slow query. Ideally, add the same information for the fast v13 case.
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
--
Simon Windsor
Eml: simon(dot)windsor(at)cornfield(dot)me(dot)uk
Mob: 0755 197 9733
“There is nothing in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and he who considers price only is that man's lawful prey.”
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-04-07 19:36:32 | Re: Slow timestamp query after upgrading from Pg13 to Pg16 |
Previous Message | Costa Alexoglou | 2025-04-07 15:34:47 | Re: Performance regression when adding LIMIT 1 to a query |