"Rocco Altier" <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com> writes:
> With the patch attached this time...
The proposed patch to Makefile.shlib makes me gag :-( ... lying to make
about what's the purpose of a rule is seldom a good idea. Please try
as attached instead. Also, I am *really* dubious about the change to
ecpg/test/Makefile.regress --- if that's necessary then this whole
exercise is wrong.
regards, tom lane