Re: Call for port reports

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-11-09 04:02:37
Message-ID: 691.1068350557@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I just tested gcc 2.95.3 on BSD/OS i386 and didn't see any change when
> using -g3 vs -g in the size of the binaries.

I saw the same with gcc 2.95.3 on HPUX. The gcc manual for this version
does claim that -g3 dumps extra info, but perhaps that is only true in
certain object-file formats.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-11-09 08:12:50 Re: bugzilla (Was: What do you want me to do?)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-09 04:00:36 Re: How to tell if SQL function gets inlined?