Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched)

From: Fabio Pardi <f(dot)pardi(at)portavita(dot)eu>
To: pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched)
Date: 2019-05-23 11:31:01
Message-ID: 68cf5e6c-8eb0-d8dc-08ec-78d8e910c17c@portavita.eu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance

Hi Mariel,

On 5/23/19 1:07 PM, Mariel Cherkassky wrote:
>
>
> Hey,
>
> I upgraded the primary, then I run the rsync command in the primary : 
> rsync --archive --delete --hard-links --size-only --no-inc-recursive
> /var/lib/pgsql/data /var/lib/pgsql/11/data/
> secondary_ip:/var/lib/pgsql/data/

rsync needs only 2 arguments, not 3.

You are here passing /var/lib/pgsql/data /var/lib/pgsql/11/data/
secondary_ip:/var/lib/pgsql/data/

and if you try to do that, you will end up copying the content of the
first folder into the third.

Therefore your secondary database will contain what on the primary is in
/var/lib/pgsql/data/ (guess, 9.6.0)

Also, I do not think it best practice (or perhaps not correct at all) to
use '--size-only'

>
> in the secondary I checked the version file and it was 11 : 
> [secondary]# cat PG_VERSION
> 11
>

from which folder are you running that? And what is the PGDATA of your
standby server?

regards,

fabio pardi

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Kumar 2019-05-23 14:53:22 pg_backrest build dependencies rpm's
Previous Message Greg Clough 2019-05-23 11:23:47 RE: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2019-05-23 15:06:58 Re: Fwd: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched)
Previous Message Greg Clough 2019-05-23 11:23:47 RE: upgrade to PG11 on secondary fails (no initdb was launched)