Re: pg_basebackup wish list

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup wish list
Date: 2016-09-13 21:52:14
Message-ID: 68a59ed1-2821-3c71-304f-b04f1c37a597@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/12/16 3:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm, there was just a kerfuffle about spelling things like this
> "--no-clean" etc. I wasn't on board with removing existing spellings,
> but surely all newly added switches should use the "no-" spelling?

This is supposed to be parallel to initdb's option. So if we rename or
migrate the one in initdb, then we can just hard-rename this one. But
until that is decided, it seems better to keep it the same as initdb has
right now.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-09-13 21:54:30 Re: An extra error for client disconnection on Windows
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-09-13 21:18:37 Re: inappropriate use of NameGetDatum macro