Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Date: 2001-02-18 00:34:22
Message-ID: 6897.982456462@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

ncm(at)zembu(dot)com (Nathan Myers) writes:
> In the 2.4 kernel it says (fs/buffer.c)

> /* this needs further work, at the moment it is identical to fsync() */
> down(&inode->i_sem);
> err = file->f_op->fsync(file, dentry);
> up(&inode->i_sem);

Hmm, that's the same code that's been there since 2.0 or before.
I had trawled the Linux kernel mail lists and found patch submissions
from several different people to make fdatasync really work, and what
I thought was an indication that at least one had been applied.
Evidently not. Oh well...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Myers 2001-02-18 02:13:19 Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-02-18 00:28:16 Re: Microsecond sleeps with select()