Re: APR 1.0 released

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I'm not sure exactly what Bruce checked, so I just spent a few cycles
> making sure that we did not inadvertantly pick up a define of WIN32 from
> windows.h anywhere else. I *think* we are OK on that. However, ISTM this
> is a foot just waiting to be shot - in retrospect using WIN32 as our
> marker for native Windows, which we do in a great many places (around
> 300 by my count) was a less than stellar choice, given that it is
> defined by windows.h, and especially since we use that header for Cygwin
> as well as for Windows native in a few places.

Well, it's easily changed, if all that's needed is a search-and-replace.
Suggestions for a better name?

regards, tom lane