Re: Documentation of return values of range functions lower and upper

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, jani(dot)rahkola(at)iki(dot)fi, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation of return values of range functions lower and upper
Date: 2023-11-02 14:42:53
Message-ID: 687683a11c0d8bd0466cedbcb99d098c11f31f97.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Thu, 2023-11-02 at 10:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Better, though "Is the range's upper bound unbounded?" makes me cringe.
>
> Oh, yeah, totally cringe, me too.  :-)
>
> > It is not the bound that is bounded or not, but the range.
> >
> > How about "Is the range unbounded at the upper end?" or "Does the range
> > have no upper bound?"
>
> I used your "end" idea to modify the patch, attached.

There are still some loose ends:

- you lost the specification whether it is the upper or the lower bound

- "Infinity" is a literal

- "-Infinity" is a very unlikely value for an upper bound

How about the attached version?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Attachment Content-Type Size
range.V2.diff text/x-patch 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-02 15:08:53 Re: 'pg_global' cannot be used as default_tablespace.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-11-02 14:14:58 Re: Documentation of return values of range functions lower and upper