Re: User Defined Types in Java

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: User Defined Types in Java
Date: 2006-02-09 14:24:56
Message-ID: 687.1139495096@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se> writes:
> I'd like to enable UDT's written in Java

Does Java really give you enough control over the bit-level
representation of an object for this goal to be considered sane?

In particular, it seems unsafe to use a Java class as a PG UDT,
because the method pointers wouldn't remain the same across
backend runs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-02-09 14:33:32 Re: User Defined Types in Java
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-02-09 14:09:45 Re: Schema search for default operator classes (was: [ADMIN] Cross schema Primary Key Indexes problem with datatype in the public schema)