| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Subject: | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2018-03-20 04:39:26 |
| Message-ID: | 685ab899-6fcb-3fdd-cd7f-d549da1218e0@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/03/20 13:30, Amit Langote wrote:
> I have incorporated your patch in the main patch after updating the
> comments a bit. Also, now that 6666ee49f49 is in [1], the transition
> table related tests I proposed yesterday pass nicely. Instead of posting
> as a separate patch, I have merged it with the main patch. So now that
> planner refactoring is unnecessary, attached is just one patch.
Sorry, I forgot to remove a hunk in the patch affecting
src/include/optimizer/prep.h. Fixed in the attached updated version.
Thanks,
Amit
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v7-0001-Fix-ON-CONFLICT-to-work-with-partitioned-tables.patch | text/plain | 42.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2018-03-20 04:57:19 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2018-03-20 04:36:00 | Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks |