| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |
| Date: | 2009-09-10 19:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | 6856.1252610579@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2009/9/10 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> 1. Allow the existing "any" pseudotype as an input argument type for PLs.
>> (AFAICS this is simple and painless; about the only question is whether
>> we want to keep using the name "any", which because of conflicting with
>> a reserved word would always need the double quotes.)
> I thing so this is possible - I see only one critical point - you
> cannot validate source in validation time.
How's it any different from anyelement?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-09-10 19:23:14 | Re: Ragged CSV import |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-09-10 19:20:52 | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |