Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> That's true, but I think it would be worthwhile to invert the switch to
> be --disable-thread-safety, since the number of people who don't
> understand the problem far outweigh the cost of the switch.
I'd vote against that unless it were done only for Linux, and personally
I think a platform-dependent default for this might be unreasonably
confusing.
regards, tom lane