Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA
Date: 2005-06-09 16:20:55
Message-ID: 6844727AE356C4B91DAFDD1A@sparkey.oopsware.intra
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Donnerstag, Juni 09, 2005 12:05:45 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> I don't think you have any choice about that --- I'm pretty sure that
> there are places that assume a table's indexes are in the same schema
> the table is. Constraints ditto.

Okay, then the consenus is to go for it.

--

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd Helmle 2005-06-09 16:30:01 Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-09 16:05:45 Re: Request for Comments: ALTER [OBJECT] SET SCHEMA