From: | "Markus Bertheau" <mbertheau(dot)pg(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Edoardo Serra" <osdevel(at)webrainstorm(dot)it> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postmaster using only 4-5% CPU |
Date: | 2006-03-21 14:10:56 |
Message-ID: | 684362e10603210610n709e223ds@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
The low end server by chance doesn't have an IDE disk that lies about
write completion, or a battery backed disk controller? Try disabling
fsync on the new server to get comparable figures.
Markus Bertheau
2006/3/21, Edoardo Serra <osdevel(at)webrainstorm(dot)it>:
> Hi all,
> I'm having a very strange performance
> problems on a fresh install of postgres 8.1.3
> I've just installed it with default option and
> --enable-thread-safety without tweaking config files yet.
>
> The import of a small SQL files into the DB (6
> tables with 166.500 total records, INSERT syntax)
> took me more than 18 minutes as shown below
> (output of "time ./psql benchmarks < dump.sql")
>
> real 18m33.062s
> user 0m10.386s
> sys 0m7.707s
>
> The server is an
> - Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz - 1MB L2
> - 1 GB RAM
> - 2x HDD SCSI U320 RAID 1 Hardware (HP 6i controller)
>
> The same import, tried on an another low-end
> server with a fresh install of postgres 8.1.3 gave me:
>
> real 2m4.497s
> user 0m6.234s
> sys 0m6.148s
>
> During the test, the postmaster on the first
> server (the slow one) uses only a 4% CPU, while
> on the second one it reaches 50% cpu usage
>
> I was thinking on a IO bandwidth saturation, but
> "vmstat 1" during the import shows me small values for io/bo column
>
> Searching the archive of the ml I found a Disk IO
> test I suddenly ran on the slower server as follow
>
> # time bash -c "dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile bs=8k
> count=200000 && sync" (write test)
> # time dd if=bigfile of=/dev/null bs=8k (read test)
>
> output of "vmstat 1" during the above test follows:
>
> procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- --system-- ----cpu----
> r b swpd free buff cache si so bi bo in cs us sy id wa
>
> Write test
> 0 11 540 2344 12152 863456 4 0 340 27848 1709 695 6 53 0 41
> 0 11 540 2344 12180 863516 4 0 44 45500 1623 386 0 2 0 98
> 0 5 540 3168 12200 862520 0 0 264 44888 1573 315 1 2 0 97
>
> Read test
> 0 2 440 2328 6076 849120 0 0 94552 0 1550 624 3 10 0 87
> 0 2 440 2248 6104 848936 0 0 94508 0 1567 715 7 10 0 83
> 0 3 440 2824 6148 847828 0 0
> 102540 448 1511 675 14 11 0 75
>
> Values of io/(bi-bo) during the disk test are a
> lot higher than during the import operation....
>
> I really have no more clues .... :(
>
> Do you have any ideas ?
>
> Tnx in advance
>
> Regards
>
>
> Edoardo Serra
> WeBRainstorm S.r.l.
> IT, Internet services & consulting
> Via Pio Foà 83/C
> 10126 Torino
> Tel: +39 011 6966881
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-03-21 14:12:08 | Re: update == delete + insert? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2006-03-21 14:03:20 | Re: Perfomance test figures |