| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch: psql \whoami option |
| Date: | 2010-01-27 15:43:04 |
| Message-ID: | 6820.1264606984@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Christensen <david(at)endpoint(dot)com> writes:
> That's a good point about forward-compatibility. In that case, I'm
> not sure if "default" is the best name for the human-readable format,
> but I didn't like "human-readable" ;-). I assume that should have an
> explicit spelling, and not just be the format that we get if we don't
> otherwise specify. Ideas, anyone?
I think this patch has near zero usecase already, and more than one
output format is *definitely* a waste of time. Forget the argument and
just print the "human readable" format.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2010-01-27 15:43:05 | Re: Review: Typed Table |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-01-27 15:41:16 | make everything target |