From: | Serge Fonville <serge(dot)fonville(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD |
Date: | 2009-02-11 11:52:10 |
Message-ID: | 680cbe0e0902110352rd493563md72a4ec17a0f3415@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
Thanks a lot for the reply
> Since the cluster will be multi-master/dual-primary, do I need to have a
>> separate block device for each PostgreSQL instance or can it use the DRBD
>> device?
>>
>
> I don't understand how you want to have a multimaster PostgreSQL setup with
> DRBD. DRBD can only be used for an inactive standby.
So, DRBD dual primary and Cybercluster multimaster, cannot be combined?
> I believe cybercluster is the most active and complete PostgreSQL
>> clustering solution.
>> My endgoal is a two node cluster with load sharing and fail over where
>> both nodes can perform reads and writes.
>>
>
> That's not going to happen very easily, if at all.
Why not?Cybercluster is a multimaster clustering solution for PostgreSQL
DRBD supports dual primary
>From the feature list:
> Dual primary support for use with GFS/OCFS2
Perhaps it can be done without DRBD then?
In many cases asynchronous replication is just not enough to model a certain
> business case.
Therefore Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH offers a synchronous multimaster
> replication solution for PostgreSQL called Cybercluster.
Thanks,
Serge Fonville
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kusuma Pabba | 2009-02-11 12:43:12 | small doubt |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-02-11 11:26:22 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering with DRBD |