Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andy Lester <andy(at)petdance(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
Date: 2009-05-01 17:32:45
Message-ID: 67A096FE-7C21-4C3D-9D2E-D55617247613@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On May 1, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

> Speaking of space/tab settings, one thing I'm fuzzy on is the rule for
> wrapping long lines. I understand that a line that extends past 80
> characters has to be wrapped, but the amount of indentation on the
> continuation line doesn't appear to follow a consistent pattern - or
> does it?

“Perl Best Practices” recommends an indentation of 4 spaces, both for
block indentations and line continuations. Not sure what'd be best for
C, though.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-05-01 17:38:38 Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-01 16:27:21 Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me