| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Adding CI to our tree |
| Date: | 2021-12-15 15:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 678495.1639581684@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 03:45:23PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2021-12-13 18:14:52 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm with Justin on this one. I would view a script trying to
>>> mess with /cores as a hostile act.
>> I'm not quite following. This is a ephemeral CI instance?
> As for myself, all I meant is that it's better to write it with zero sudos than
> one (for the same reason that it's better to write with one than with two).
What I'm concerned about is that it's unsafe to run the script in
any non-throwaway environment. That doesn't seem desirable.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-12-15 15:34:21 | Re: generalized conveyor belt storage |
| Previous Message | Benoit Lobréau | 2021-12-15 15:20:42 | Re: Probable memory leak with ECPG and AIX |