From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
Date: | 2019-07-23 17:28:47 |
Message-ID: | 6762.1563902927@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> Does anyone have a stress test for parallel workers ?
> On a customer's new VM, I got this several times while (trying to) migrate their DB:
> < 2019-07-23 10:33:51.552 CDT postgres >FATAL: postmaster exited during a parallel transaction
We've been seeing this irregularly in the buildfarm, too. I've been
suspicious that it's from an OOM kill on the postmaster in the
buildfarm cases, but ...
> There's nothing in dmesg nor in postgres logs.
... you'd think an OOM kill would show up in the kernel log.
(Not necessarily in dmesg, though. Did you try syslog?)
> Ideally a minimal test, since I'm apparently going to
> have to run under gdb to see how it's dying, or even what process is failing.
Like it told you, it's the postmaster that's going away.
That's Not Supposed To Happen, of course, but unfortunately Linux'
OOM kill heuristic preferentially targets the postmaster when
its children are consuming too many resources.
If that is the problem, there's some info on working around it at
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-MEMORY-OVERCOMMIT
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-07-23 17:31:53 | Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-23 17:21:14 | Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of NOTIFY over many databases (issue blocking on AccessExclusiveLock on object 0 of class 1262 of database 0) |