Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?
Date: 2005-06-23 04:21:54
Message-ID: 675.1119500514@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Also, that routine will disappear entirely if we agree to remove
> commit_siblings (see nearby thread), so right at the moment I'm not very
> concerned about improving it. If it is still there forty-eight hours
> from now, let's talk about it then.

Oh, never mind that, I was momentarily confusing it with
CountActiveBackends. But the other point stands.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Maxwell 2005-06-23 04:25:34 Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-23 04:18:38 Re: HaveNFreeProcs ?