Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table

From: Dimitrios Apostolou <jimis(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
Date: 2025-04-04 13:13:09
Message-ID: 67469c1c-38bc-7d94-918a-67033f5dd731@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 2 Apr 2025, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:

> Hello list.
>
> My database includes one table with 1000 partitions, all of them rather

I was not clear here: my database dump has all that, and the database is
brand new and empty.

> sizeable. I run:
>
> pg_restore -j12 --no-tablespaces --disable-triggers --exit-on-error
> --no-owner --no-privileges -n public -d newdb custom_format_dump.pgdump
>
> Right now after 24h of restore, I notice weird behaviour, so I have several
> questions about it:
>
> + 11 postgres backend processes are sleeping as "TRUNCATE TABLE waiting".
> I see that they are waiting to issue a TRUNCATE for one of the
> partitions and then COPY data to it. Checking the log I see that
> several partitions have already been copied finished, but many more
> are left to start.
>
> Why is a TRUNCATE needed at the start of a partition's COPY phase? I
> didn't issue a --clean on the command line (I don't need it as my
> database is newly created), and I don't see a mention of related
> TRUNCATE in the pg_restore manual.
>
> + 1 postgres backend process is doing:
>
> ALTER TABLE the_master_partitioned_table
> ADD CONSTRAINT ...
> FOREIGN KEY (columnX) REFERENCES another_table(columnX)
>
> According to my logs this started right after COPY DATA for
> another_table was finished. And apparently it has a lock on
> the_master_partitioned_table that all other TRUNCATE have to wait for.
>
> Is this a bug in the dependency resolution? Wouldn't it make sense for
> this to wait until all 1000 partitions have finished their COPY DATA
> phase?

Trying again, pg_restore exited with error after almost 24h:

pg_restore: while PROCESSING TOC:
pg_restore: from TOC entry 8904; 2606 16529 CONSTRAINT test_runs_raw test_runs_raw_partitioned_pkey
pg_restore: error: could not execute query: ERROR: deadlock detected
DETAIL: Process 465409 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 44437 of database 44090; blocked by process 465408.
Process 465408 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 44383 of database 44090; blocked by process 465409.
HINT: See server log for query details.

From the logs I see that:

+ Process 465409 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation 44437 of database 44090; blocked by process 465408.
--> 44437 is test_runs_raw__part_max10120k (a single partition)
+ Process 465408 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 44383 of database 44090; blocked by process 465409.
--> 44383 is test_runs_raw (the master partitioned table)

Process 465409:
ALTER TABLE ONLY public.test_runs_raw
ADD CONSTRAINT test_runs_raw_partitioned_pkey PRIMARY KEY (workitem_n, run_n);

Process 465408:
COPY public.test_runs_raw__part_max10120k(...) FROM stdin;

Bug? This happened on a postgres compiled from last week's master branch.
The dump I'm trying to restore is from postgres 17.4.

Thanks
Dimitris

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2025-04-04 15:02:43 Re: Performance issues during pg_restore -j with big partitioned table
Previous Message Willy-Bas Loos 2025-04-04 11:42:50 Re: find replication slots that "belong" to a publication