Re: RI_ConstraintTrigger question

From: George Essig <george(dot)essig(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org" <pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RI_ConstraintTrigger question
Date: 2005-09-27 04:20:04
Message-ID: 6744b38505092621201c3d4f62@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/26/05, pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org <pobox(at)verysmall(dot)org> wro
>
> We have a database with about 30 tables and some RI. The RI constraints,
> however, were not named upon creation of the database 2-3 years ago and
> now when we get an error it contains <unnamed> for the constraint.
>
> I tried Google and the documentation, and I still have 2 questions -
>
> 1. Is it possible to rename RI_ConstraintTrigger, so that we do not get
> <unnamed> in the errors.
>
> 2. Is there somewhere explanation what the RI_FKey_ procedures mean?

I think RI stand for referential integrity. Foreign keys used to be
implemented using 'create constraint trigger' which automatically names
triggers 'RI_ConstraintTrigger_' then some integer which I guess is an oid
(object id).

Constraint triggers execute functions to implement a constraint. RI_FKey_...
are the functions that implement foreign key constraints for different
events like insert, update, and delete.

When you upgrade a database it's likely that the oids for different database
objects will change. In sounds like somehow you upgraded and retained
references to old oids which don't exist anymore. Just a guess.

I suggest you upgrade to a newer version of PostgreSQL and drop all of the
'RI_ConstraintTrigger_' trigger and recreate the foreign keys.

George Essig

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message surabhi.ahuja 2005-09-27 06:27:32 insertion becoming slow
Previous Message Gnanavel S 2005-09-27 04:15:25 Re: How many insert + update should one transaction handle?