From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | toamitahuja(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16554: Consistent sequence gaps occuring next day |
Date: | 2020-07-25 14:42:59 |
Message-ID: | 672931.1595688179@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> It has been observed that the sequences are starting with a gap of around 30
> ( more or less) the next day. The sequences are generated sequentially
> (continuous with no gaps) on/within the same day. However once the
> application/server is stopped and restarted the next day , the sequence
> starts with a gap ( mostly around 30 or may be 10 , 20 etc).
This is expected behavior, as a result of optimization to reduce the
amount of WAL traffic generated by nextval calls. The optimization
is not user-adjustable (cf. SEQ_LOG_VALS in sequence.c).
It's not particularly worth doing something about it, because if your
application requires a gapless sequence, you cannot use Postgres
sequence objects to get that anyway. Transactions that roll back
after executing a nextval() will also cause gaps.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2020-07-25 21:43:28 | Re: Buffers from parallel workers not accumulated to upper nodes with gather merge |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-07-25 14:35:30 | Re: subquery column error causes data destroying equality |