Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue
Date: 2011-08-01 19:53:19
Message-ID: 672.1312228399@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> OK, so I should split this into 2 patches?
> Even without the compression, it's probably worth the 16 -> 10 byte
> reduction that would result from removing the 2nd CTID in the UPDATE
> case, and that part would be a pretty small patch.

Yeah, my point exactly. The rest of it might or might not be worth the
extra complication.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-08-01 20:02:39 Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2011-08-01 19:48:07 Re: Compressing the AFTER TRIGGER queue